Joined
·
1,645 Posts
OK so I am really tired of the SE not being considered a real challenger because of the V6 by some people.
It's like saying a mustang isn't a mustang unless it's a GT...that's crap.
Note...this attitude is not from anyone on this forum.
In comparing to the originol Challengers, which also had V6's in the base models, the current 3.5L has more bhp than a number of the originol engines, including the V8's
Current SE engine out horsepowers the 225 cu 3.7L, 318 cu 5.2L, 360 cu 5.9L.
The originol engines also where not dyno tested with any accessories like air filters etc which I'm sure would have dropped horsepower.
So whats the deal? When is a challenger a real challenger?
Is it the HEMI? Because I think only the originol 426 cu 7L was a HEMI motor.
Are all those originol Challengers without HEMI's not challengers?
The classic 440 cu six pack out horsepowers the current R/T HEMI so are they not true challengers?
Sorry but this is a sore spot for me.
OK rant over...
It's like saying a mustang isn't a mustang unless it's a GT...that's crap.
Note...this attitude is not from anyone on this forum.
In comparing to the originol Challengers, which also had V6's in the base models, the current 3.5L has more bhp than a number of the originol engines, including the V8's
Current SE engine out horsepowers the 225 cu 3.7L, 318 cu 5.2L, 360 cu 5.9L.
The originol engines also where not dyno tested with any accessories like air filters etc which I'm sure would have dropped horsepower.
So whats the deal? When is a challenger a real challenger?
Is it the HEMI? Because I think only the originol 426 cu 7L was a HEMI motor.
Are all those originol Challengers without HEMI's not challengers?
The classic 440 cu six pack out horsepowers the current R/T HEMI so are they not true challengers?
Sorry but this is a sore spot for me.
OK rant over...